Menu toggle

Cayman 718 GPF Failure

Hi Guys & Girls

Without prejudice

To continue on with our challenge to Porsche Technical for them to confirm to us that our cars have a manual adaptation facility on PWIS that would re set the oil ash reading to zero.

Found this VCDS (VW) video on YouTube that shows how easy it could be, its on a DPF, but its the same on a GPF car.

This is what we would expect to see on our cars, or something very similar.

Both DPF and GPF vehicles have to have an adaptation capability in order to reset the ECU, when either the filters or the differential pressure sensors are replaced in service.

Hopefully this week we will get confirmation, either from the Dealers, or maybe Porsche Technical at Reading.

Dave

 
Hi Guys & Girls

Without prejudice

I never stop thinking about this GPF emission control issue on our cars, and the phone never stops ringing, its frustrating that after more than 2.5 years we have still no answers from Porsche or their dealers on why its taking so long to fix these cars.

We have so many questions to ask Porsche Technical, so let's go.

1. Why when, we have asked the Dealers to check for back pressure on the cars that have been diagnosed with a blocked GPF, have they always refused to do it.

2. Why have the Dealers and Porsche Technical ignored the very low differential pressure sensor readings on all the cars with a oil ash filter reading at 100%.

3. Why when we see a GPF report showing the oil ash at 100% do we never see any significant soot values, bearing in mind if the filter's blocked with ASH, weres the soot going to go.

4. Why if the filter is blocked 100% and needs changing, do we not see any other DTC codes, a blocked GPF would certainly leave other running codes. For a start, if the exhaust is blocked you would expect to see, running and performance issues surely.

5. Why when a new filter is fitted, do we get a zero oil ash % reading, then within a few hundred miles it comes back with an average oil ash % reading of between 48 and 58%, we had a reading of 64% on one of the first cars we looked at a few years ago.

6. Why are the Dealers carrying out regenerations and miles and miles of road testing after these new modified filters have been fitted.

7. Why is the modified GPF filter, part no 982 254 400AF not fixing these cars, the internal memo sent out in March this year said it would.

8. Why are the Dealers still telling our owners that driving style is the reason why these filters need changing, we have had 2 in the last 2 weeks.

8. Why after all the parts that had been fitted to Pauls old car, did we have a situation where Porsche and the Dealer couldn't get his oil ash level % down to zero permanently, bearing in mind it never left the garage. And they bought the car back off him.

9. Why can Ash be here one minute and then gone the next, if its real ash.

10. Why now after a new modified GPF filter is fitted, can the Dealers tell us that a reading of 54% is acceptable, after such a short time, and no further work will be carried out.

11. Why will Dealers not answer our questions regarding the possible manual adaptation of the differential pressure sensor, and the GPF oil ash function on our cars, do they have it, or not, thats all we are asking.

We will get confirmation very soon regarding the real reason why the Dealers are struggling to reset the oil ash levels.

Any feedback from this post would be greatly appreciated

Dave
 
Written in that way it reads to me the Dealers have been told what to do or not to do by Porsche, so they are following the instructions.
If this thought of mine is true then the issue is simply being ignored by Porsche and the dealers are tied.

Doubt the dealers will break silence, and only Porsche in the UK or better still Germany can answer those very relative and reasonable questions you have written.
Do Porsche UK have the ability to give answers? What level is the UK tech team or are they the group who are not allowed to face the customer?

There must surely be an open door for this in Porsche UK?
 
Take those questions to the motoring press and get them to ask Porsche. It's really frustrating that the same questions are being asked and the same silence comes from the manufacturer. If you want answers to questions then the only option is pressure by full exposure to the general public.

Porsche are quite literally on their arse at the minute (just look at discounts on new 911) and I think that if a scandal like this came to light it would make a big dent in their reputation to such end that they'd rather solve it quickly. It does make me wonder though if PGB are actually passing these issues onto the mother ship.

Dan
 
Hi Guys

Without prejudice

Thanks for the feedback, we are now at a point where we have to prove 100% that the reason for the Dealers struggling to sort this out, is the the inability to perform a correct reset of these values.

Your right the Dealers have never been in a position to tell us the truth even when the internal memo sent out in March, dropped in their inbox.

But they are still accountable, they have technicians and Managers and Senior Managers that know what the issue is, but has long as Porsche are paying them valuable workshop hours why would they go against them.

It seems after all this time they would rather embarase themselves, with pathetic reasons for blaming the owners of these cars for this problem, using driving style has the cause of this fault, and they are still clearly agreeing with Porsche Technicals advice and guidance.

Along time ago we sent an email to Porsche Technical Reading requesting to go down to see them to see if they could answer our questions regarding the soot regeneration warning light not coming on, and why the ash had come back on our new modified filter.

We where told that they where not customer facing and we should go back to the dealer who fitted the modified GPF.

The reason we wanted to speak to them was because the Dealer concerned said if the new modified filter blocked up again the owner would have to pay, the ash level increased twice in 1500 miles and it reached 55%.

Because of all this stress the owner Mark sold his car, and he has been behind me on this journey right from the start. In fact he was the first owner with this fault, that I convinced Porsche
that this fault wasn't the customers fault, and they paid for the filter.

This is becoming a major miss diagnosis of an emission control function on their cars. They are quite happy to loose valuable customers, along with reputation, and between them they are affecting the brilliant technical advances that have been made on these 718 cars, and thats why people bought them, love them, and in most cases Ive seen, never ever wanted to sell them.

Our next step is to speak to the people out there in the Vehicle Emission World and ask them if they can get our questions to Porsche answered, before this situation gets even worse.

Somebody somewhere is responsible for this ridiculous situation we are in with these cars, mistakes happen its a fact of life, most things can be fixed, reputation can be rebuilt, its time the people responsible stood up and became accountable.

Fingers crossed

Dave, and all the people out there, affected by this issue.
 
Thanks Dave, I really don't know what I would have done without your help, I was facing a large bill and the dealership and Porsche Technical couldn't be less helpful if they tried, they had taken my £50K and didn't want to know!
I was getting nowhere with either of them so I contacted Porsche in Germany and guess what?? they didn't want to know either, they said because I had purchased the car in the UK I had to speak to Porsche GB effectively washing their hands of it.
I then had to pay a third to get the GPF replaced, but after Dave's intervention they gave me my money back...why would they do that? I believe they did that because they knew of the problem all along!!!
As Dan said Porsche are on their arse at the minute and i'm not surprised, they are such an arrogant company that don't respect or treat their customers well, what goes around comes around!!
I really believe Dave will get to the bottom of this and it will get sorted, keep up the good work!
Regards
Mark
 
Hi Guys & Girls

Without prejudice

Well, I've had a brilliant week dealing with more GPF issues on our cars which has been very productive.

Porsche have kindly fitted a modified GPF filter to 13 of our 718 cars, unfortunately they only agreed after we presented them with information that contradicted their diagnosis of the fault code P242F oil ash load exceeded.

From the start we have always said that a very low differential pressure sensor reading didnt go with a filter supposedly found to show a reading of 100% full.

On every vehicle we have dealt with and managed to get sight of page 42 of the Val report (vehicle analysis log) we found the same readings, very little pressure from the K251 reading.

We need to go back to the beginning when these cars were new, 2019.

We know from the information written on the internal memo that Porsche sent to their dealers in March this year, that they had been having issues with this oil ash load to high, back then.

Even the fault code P242F was the same, and they even came up with a modified filter to correct this issue, which was fitted to vehicles with a production date later than December 2019.

This is what they said in the last paragraph of the memo, explaining what to do if this fault code is present.

If no causes can be located and the above checks are all confirmed as OK then in some cases the OPF can be recovered therefore a OPF regeneration should be attempted to see if the OPF ash load is able to reset.If this has already been attempted or the ash load level does not reset when the OPF regeneration is attempted then the OPF should be replaced and the vehicle retested. The new OPFs (982254400AF) have been modified to prevent this issue. All vehicles with a production date later than December 2019 should already have the modified OPF and are therefore not relevant to this document. If there are any issues outside of this model year range or any further questions please submit a PRMS ticket or email directly.

This week I managed to have a conversation with a Technician working on one of our cars with the P242F oil ash exceeded code present.

He found my phone number on the forum, and was asking for help, after he had read lots of our posts on this subject.

He had already carried out a regeneration using his PWIS tester and managed to lower the oil ash reading, but he had soot and differential pressure sensor readings that didn't seem correct.

So the plan was to carry out another regeneration and see what happens.
After that regeneration and a road test, the ash came back at 52%.
He then carried out 2 more regenerations including road tests and he finally got a zero oil ash measured reading of zero.

I asked him then to go and have a look for the Adaptation page on PWIS, he found Adaptations and then Reset Adaptations Unfortunately has we suspected there was no facility to reset the adaptation on either the differential pressure sensor or the GPF.
He spent some time looking, but unfortunatly couldn't find anything at all, he sent me photos of the revelant pages to prove this.

So this clearly shows that these cars appear not to have the reset facility that they should have. And the only way the Dealers can reset the oil ash is by regeneration and lots of road testing which is also confirmed in the internal memo instruction.

It also means that Porsche Reading Technical must have known this, because they would have had the same issue in 2019 after they fitted the new modified filters to cars with this fault.

Its shocking how our owners have been treated by Porsche and their Dealers, they have both carried on with this miss diagnosis for far to long.

We have had 13 of our vehicles fitted with modified filters, and every one has come back with oil ash readings that defy any logic, from between 45% to 64%. Porsche now are saying this is exceptable.

Out of those 13 cars, 8 have been sold, because the owners had lost confidence with Porsche and their Dealers, regarding the other 5 cars we are still waiting for an answer from the Dealers and Porsche of what they are going to do next.

I have had dealings with many others with this fault, and the way they have all been treated is absolutely appalling.

Found this on the Internet

If a vehicle manufacturer replaces an emission part that doesn't fix the original fault, they may have to re-evaluate the vehicle's type-approval and comply with new emission standards, especially under the EU's type- approval regulations and in-service conformity rules. Manufacturers are required to ensure their vehicles' emissions remain within limits throughout their normal life.

So I think we have finally got to the reason why this oil ash problem is on these cars, its simply, the oil ash reset function on the cars we have seen, was not programed in from new.

If it had been, they would not have had to come up with another modified filter, and carry on this pretence that has caused a major loss of confidence with the Brand, Dealers and the financial implications this has caused along the way.

Over to you Porsche

Dave
 
What an interesting latest post Dave, real progress!
I cannot grasp why Porsche would redesign/modify the actual filter to fix the software missing resets.

If you have a car with a bad filter, and then replace it with a virgin modified filter (presumably proven to fix the original issue) the dealer would find he cannot get the values to 'as-new' status/levels. Why did the Factory not find the same issue??

Thus the Dealer has to ask the factory (or whoever) how to re-set the car to accept the virgin filter?

Little wonder the Brand or at least the 718 will get this stain for ever more.

Should have asked VW to fix it all...
 

Posts made and opinions expressed are those of the individual forum members

Use of the Forum is subject to the Terms and Conditions

Disclaimer

The opinions expressed on this site are not necessarily those of the Club, who shall have no liability in respect of them or the accuracy of the content. The Club assumes no responsibility for any effects arising from errors or omissions.

Porsche Club Great Britain gives no warranties, guarantees or assurances and makes no representations or recommendations regarding any goods or services advertised on this site. It is the responsibility of visitors to satisfy themselves that goods and/or services supplied by any advertiser are bona fide and in no instance can the Porsche Club Great Britain be held responsible.

When responding to advertisements please ensure that you satisfy yourself of any applicable call charges on numbers not prefixed by usual "landline" STD Codes. Information can be obtained from the operator or the white pages. Before giving out ANY information regarding cars, or any other items for sale, please satisfy yourself that any potential purchaser is bona fide.

Directors of the Board of Porsche Club GB, Club Office Staff, Register Secretaries and Regional Organisers are often requested by Club members to provide information on matters connected with their cars and other matters referred to in the Club Rules. Such information, advice and assistance provided by such persons is given in good faith and is based on the personal experience and knowledge of the individual concerned.

Neither Porsche Club GB, nor any of the aforementioned, shall be under any liability in respect of any such information, advice or assistance given to members. Members are advised to consult qualified specialists for information, advice and assistance on matters connected with their cars at all times.

Back
Top