ORIGINAL: jwindwood
ORIGINAL: Chunk49
Jwindwood - thanks for the offer but I really like the look of the 944 much more than the 924. And then there's the whole 944 is a proper porsche and a 924 isn't etc. Out of interest though, why is the 924 cheaper to maintain?
The 924 is just as much a proper Porsche as any of the others-heck, it's the car that saved the company in the 1980s! The reason its so much cheaper to maintain is basically because of the many VW Audi components it uses and the simplicity of the design. For instance, a 944 cambelt etc can cost £300 to get changed. A 924 cambelt kit costs £30, takes about an hour to fit and if it breaks, it won't damage the engine as it's a non-interference engine.
Front suspension bottom wishbones-S2 944 use alloy at up to £400 a piece. The 924 uses steel VW Golf ones (Like the very early 944) that cost £15ish each. Need I go on? []
Ah I see - yes there is a MASSIVE difference in parts prices (ignoring labour which I may or may not be able to do myself).
Is the compromise/answer to go for an early 944? Would that achieve a compromise by getting the looks of the 944 (which I want) with the cheap parts of the 924?
At the moment my head (based on all the helpful advice I've been receiving) is saying go for a 924, but my heart still says 944! Out of interest, are there any other cars (not necessarily Porsche) that I should probably be considering too? the thing I like about the 944 is that it's a proper manly coupe not a slightly girly (in my opinion) MX5.