ORIGINAL: pauljmcnulty
Me buying it isn't to have 12 months worth of motoring and not to have an MOT in my ownership. Ideally, I would probably have the car for 2 or 3 years
Well that's your issue, then. One year might be enough to get lucky with a 25-year-old Porsche for £1500 and no significant costs, but three? No way.
You really will have to either treat the car as a cheap "scrapper", and throw it away when the first bills come in. Or, treat it as a better car than the equivalent 911, and far cheaper, but still a car that costs thousands, rather than hundreds, to own over several years.
Thinking really cheap, rear-wheel fun for little money I'd still go for a 924, or an early MX5. If you can't work on the car yourself, like me, you're in to £500 for a basic service and odd things that need doing, every year. Plus the inevitable things like the brake overhaul and fuel lines that cost me £3K last year alone. Get what you want straight first, then look at what suits you best. []
Again good points. As I said, £500 - £1,000 a year over three years I'd be prepared to spend, but I think if it came to £3k bills I would just sell the car rather than incur that cost! IT is food for thought.
Why are 924s so much cheaper to run/maintain than the 944?
I suppose there won't be many cars that offer mega bang for buck at around £1,500, that are cool, pretty and desirable AND low cost maintenance? I hear the MX5s are supposed to be fairly bullet proof, but to be honest I really don't want a convertible and not a smaller (dare I say it slightly 'girly') one. And I LOVE Porsche. Wanted one for ages.