Menu toggle

3.0 944 turbo

Yeah its that one was too cheap to not buy I think it is Alusil but if not I will just get the entire block sleeved with steel as soon people say this is Stronger anyway.
 

ORIGINAL: u63af

Right guys.

I now have a 968 block with crank and a 2.7 head.


I just want a solid reliable engine for some track and road use.

Excellent work! In your position I would look at some small alterations to the cooling (lower temp thermostat and larger/or at least new standard radiator). Then copy Hartech and run it with standard turbo at standard boost.

You will have a lot of reliable fun.
 
ORIGINAL: DivineE


ORIGINAL: u63af

Right guys.

I now have a 968 block with crank and a 2.7 head.


I just want a solid reliable engine for some track and road use.

Excellent work! In your position I would look at some small alterations to the cooling (lower temp thermostat and larger/or at least new standard radiator). Then copy Hartech and run it with standard turbo at standard boost.

You will have a lot of reliable fun.

Just my opinion but I have to disagree, running a standard turbo on a 3.0 on track will create too much back pressure which is not good for longevity. You will just be choking the engine and it will not be efficient in terms of heat or fuel. If you fit a low temp thermostat then you need to fit a low temp fan switch to go with it or the setup is out of sync. Not sure this is the right solution though. Better to try and reduce temps with properly matched components and good mapping. A large radiator is a long way down the list of modifications I would make to a 3.0 turbo, I would fit a larger oil cooler first. My car is still running a standard radiator but I did fit a new one. I cant see any point in building a 3.0 turbo and then sticking a standard turbo on it for a road/ track car. The 2.5 has more than enough potential to tune if you are going to use the same turbo and will give better results in that case.
 
I was already going to get a Garrett gt30 anyway so this is on my list to do. I find the standard turbo is a bit slow to come in and want a roller bearing One. Just going to run it next year on the 2.5 and build the 3.0 on the side.

Ps I paid £250 plus 90 p&p for he 968 block and crank so I am pretty happy with this? :)
 

ORIGINAL: u63af

Ps I paid £250 plus 90 p&p for he 968 block and crank so I am pretty happy with this? :)

Yes I was watching it and spoke to the seller, too wary to buy unseen though, hope it's all good.
 
You will also need the crank cambelt pulley from an 8v engine and a solution to the top coolant elbow on the head.
I'm using the 2.7 one at the moment and it means the boost pipes rub on the bonnet. Turbo one wont fit and neither will the 16v one.
 

ORIGINAL: u63af

I was already going to get a Garrett gt30 anyway so this is on my list to do. I find the standard turbo is a bit slow to come in and want a roller bearing One. Just going to run it next year on the 2.5 and build the 3.0 on the side.

Ps I paid £250 plus 90 p&p for he 968 block and crank so I am pretty happy with this? :)

Thats serious work there, are you good at welding?
 
Good luck with it Sandy,
the results will be impressive if you can get the piston / bore materials and the engine management right.
Have you a horsepower ballpark figure in mind? when I hear 3" Exhaust and Big Turbo, you have to be hitting 380 minimum?
Its a nice project, and I know I would find it rewarding given the time to research and procure and build.
If I may say so, get an AFR onto it early so you know its not going to do a meltdown.

George
944T
 
I already have a wide band innovate afr gauge and knock sensor so hopefully it won't melt.

Does anyone know if the sump off the s2 is the same as the 968 as I need one. Might look at a crank scraper aswell.

Would it be stupid using standard turbo Rods or do you think they will be ok?
 
I think the 103.4 Rarst (early factory) rods are supposed to be the strongest, not sure which ones you have. I think the sump is similar, not sure if it is 100% the same. I think my car has an S2 sump.
 
ORIGINAL: u63af

Would it be stupid using standard turbo Rods or do you think they will be ok?

Only you can decide that, find a good set of forged turbo rods and probably ok, on the other hand who knows what those rods have been through in 25 years, I'm tight but I'd still stump up for new rods, ask os951 maybe he can get you a deal on some.
 
If you use standard, it would have to be early spec as Nick suggests.

My opinion is they would be fine, subject to a condition check by an engine builder with a Surface Table and Dial gauge.

The rods do not deteriorate with age, in fact they can improve with age due to heat cycling and the effect on the steel grain structure, In the 80's BMW used 4 cyl engine blocks out of old 318's to build F1 engines.
The bolts could suffer fatigue with use but they will be renewed along with the bearings.

George
944
 

ORIGINAL: George Elliott



My opinion is they would be fine, subject to a condition check by an engine builder with a Surface Table and Dial gauge.

The rods do not deteriorate with age, in fact they can improve with age due to heat cycling and the effect on the steel grain structure,

If the engine builder has x ray vision, and assuming the rods weren't bent/twisted and someone tweaked them straight

Good luck if those rods came out of something like Fens old engine [:D]
 

ORIGINAL: pauly


ORIGINAL: George Elliott



My opinion is they would be fine, subject to a condition check by an engine builder with a Surface Table and Dial gauge.

The rods do not deteriorate with age, in fact they can improve with age due to heat cycling and the effect on the steel grain structure,

If the engine builder has x ray vision, and assuming the rods weren't bent/twisted and someone tweaked them straight

Good luck if those rods came out of something like Fens old engine [:D]

With a little due dilligence it is not hard to source good used ones. Plenty have done this before with good results.
 
I think if I were making a 3L motor out of those components I would definitely opt for new rods with the new pistons. Wossner can do both and seem very well priced. Using a rod that is 20+ years old might be a risk worth avoiding in the long run.
 
I can see both sides to this argument. In my mind if for example you were to rebuild a 2.5 then you would probably not change the rods or pistons. If I were to get rods that were second hand then I would replace bolts etc with arp. My other side of thinking is that by the time I buy new bolts etc it will prob cost about exta £400. I probably will get new ones unless I can find a second hand set from someone I trust.

What pistons does os951 sell and have many people used them?
 
I imagine it has sold, it was well priced and a "does what it says on the tin" type of car. Unusual colour too, like a non-metallic midnight blue.
George
 

Posts made and opinions expressed are those of the individual forum members

Use of the Forum is subject to the Terms and Conditions

Disclaimer

The opinions expressed on this site are not necessarily those of the Club, who shall have no liability in respect of them or the accuracy of the content. The Club assumes no responsibility for any effects arising from errors or omissions.

Porsche Club Great Britain gives no warranties, guarantees or assurances and makes no representations or recommendations regarding any goods or services advertised on this site. It is the responsibility of visitors to satisfy themselves that goods and/or services supplied by any advertiser are bona fide and in no instance can the Porsche Club Great Britain be held responsible.

When responding to advertisements please ensure that you satisfy yourself of any applicable call charges on numbers not prefixed by usual "landline" STD Codes. Information can be obtained from the operator or the white pages. Before giving out ANY information regarding cars, or any other items for sale, please satisfy yourself that any potential purchaser is bona fide.

Directors of the Board of Porsche Club GB, Club Office Staff, Register Secretaries and Regional Organisers are often requested by Club members to provide information on matters connected with their cars and other matters referred to in the Club Rules. Such information, advice and assistance provided by such persons is given in good faith and is based on the personal experience and knowledge of the individual concerned.

Neither Porsche Club GB, nor any of the aforementioned, shall be under any liability in respect of any such information, advice or assistance given to members. Members are advised to consult qualified specialists for information, advice and assistance on matters connected with their cars at all times.

Back
Top