John, You're right - a car that is designed to work with a servo on the brakes will be harder to stop when the servo stops working. And the difference can be significant - more than enough to take someone by surprise if it stops working unexpectedly. And yes, cars with braking servos are designed with the assumption that the servo usually works, cars without a servo have different geometry in pedal leverage, different pad material and so on. However the only difference is the amount of force you need to put on the brake pedal to achieve the same degree of retardation; the brakes still work. Indeed, the who system is designed to be fail-safe; it is designed to continue to work when the servo packs up to ensure it remains safe. To suggest the car suddenly becomes unsafe when the servo is disconnected isn't true; you need to take the difference into account when out on the road, but driving around the conditions presented to is part of being a good driver. Driving with a duff brake servo is similar in many ways to driving on snow and ice; it isn't dangerous if you are aware of what you are doing, although some people will find it too different for them to be comfortable with. Yes, I have driven cars some distances with broken brake servos. (A couple of old Capri's, a somewhat dilapidated Mk1 Passat and a few Golfs. Not the 944, but I assume that is much the same.) No, it's not great. Yes, the brakes are always very very heavy. Yes you need to think about what you are doing. But I don't agree that it is dangerous per se. Oli.