pauljmcnulty
Active member
I wonder if the insurers have changed their strategy on renewal costs?
Although we all see insurance as a tax, and a license to print money for the companies, in fact motor policies lose money for them on average. The current ease of doing a quick comparison for a better deal is good in the sense it gets us the lowest price, but also carries a risk that they have to hit you somewhere else. That might be on service, perhaps that the reaosn for the problem I had, and Chris has had, with Classicline: someone who's insured my car for 10 years without fault until recently.
I'm sure it's partly a coincidence, but I also suspect that all insurance brokers are struggling to compete with the online comparison sites. What worries me is that you need to rely on the broker in the event of a claim. Fair enough, if you go for the cheapest cover from a major insurer, you appreciate that your 944 is valued at £900 book price, and a small knock means your pride and joy is off to the crusher. We need the specialist brokers though, as they understand agreed values, local specialist repairers etc.
It's a real concern if the multi-national insurers become so cheap they put the specialists out of business. Whilst I understand the need to save money if possible, insuring a specialist car isn't best done through someone like Direct Line or Tesco, unless you accept it's almost third-party cover. The car will be written off in the event of a claim, simple as that.
We also have a collective responsibility to minimise claims. That means not taking the hire car if you don't need it, or any other extras. I was shocked by the level of bullying I got, pressurising me to take every possible extra service, including personal injury, for a small car-park knock. When you understand that the insurer gets a commission from the hire-car company, the legal team, the recovery driver, you see why they push for all the "free" services you can claim, but this all adds masses to the premiums next year.