Menu toggle

968 3.0 8v Turbo dyno results

From what I can remember just after moving from this turbo to the GTX3076R, the Garrett turbine made a significant difference up top, as I would find myself upshifting a good 1000 rpm later, which came a bit as a surprise. Initial feelings were quite mixed as I needed to rev the engine higher to make it feel alive, which involved rethinking my driving style. Honestly I was a bit disappointed. However, with the previous turbo, the std inlet made for ridiculous mid range torque, and the car was just too fast off boost because of the tall 951 gearing, when I didn't want it to be fast, and the engine was not breathing as much as I felt it could when I was pushing it. With the GTX turbo, the short runner intake later gave the upper room needed for the higher-flowing compressor, and made the car slower mid range, which was just what it was missing to be a fun drive again, but it affected much the overall engine feel and I had to relearn how to control the engine.

Though the rate at which Nick's turbo builds boost is remarkable from the dyno sheet, I would still say that the short ratios of the 968 gearbox don't load the turbo as well as it could - I once saw 17psi at 2700rpm in 3rd gear when I was fiddling with boost settings. I'm sure Nick could get close to that by polishing boost settings. Whether the engine's VE will be high enough to injest that much air at such low revs is another topic though!
My friend with the 450bhp 3.0 8V uses a #8 turbine and runs 1.2 bar of boost, but his compressor is I think slightly smaller than on Nick's turbo, and thanks to a modern BW turbine wheel sees no more than 2.0 bar of back pressure. With a higher-flowing compressor and a less efficient turbine wheel, I bet Nick may now be seeing quite a bit more back pressure than "only" 2.0 bar, which certainly goes in line with the fact he saw no more power with 1.2 bar of boost than with 0.9. At this point this leads me to believe the turbine will affect the upper end more than the intake. A LR intake will shift the curves to the right slightly, but the engine may not be making that additional power any more healthily.

I would measure back pressure some times in the future, but firstly fiddle with the boost settings to perfect the low and mid range capabilities of this turbo. I don't see a GT turbo like my GTX3076R performing quite as well with the short 6 speed gearbox, unless going smaller in compressor size like with a GTX3071R.

PS : I'll make myself available for a beer or two in Blighty should you Pat come over. About time we all have a proper real chat!
 
That is all very useful info and we have discussed these issues before. There may also be other factors effecting things here so direct comparisons are risky. The different gearbox, larger intercooler and other differences will all have an effect on spool and the response/ power curve. You also have no dyno sheets only feel but my dyno backs up how you felt your old turbo tail off. There are no boost settings to adjust that I know of only to play with the fuel and timing maps....?
 
On the camshaft I am not sure I agree that head is limiting things here or thom would not have seen such good top end improvements here. The cam for me here is probably helping the meat of the torque curve and will come into its own once I can remove the restriction at the top end. I agree with the theory the hot side may be a little restrictive and the cold side a little over sized but more testing is the key.
 
Are you really sure the volume of your IC is bigger than mine? Yours is a taller but seems to be quite a bit thinner. I would be surprised there's enough between them to affect spool. Mine didn't really affect spool over the std one.

How are you controlling boost? Open, closed loop?
In closed loop increasing Proportional gain should greatly improve spool up but overboost will have to be compensated with the Integral and Derivative gains, when a trim table involving gears is not needed on top. I have found this the most touchy aspect in properly tuning my engine, and I'm not yet where I think I can get. It's a real pain in the back!

Open loop is far easier to dial in and we can simulate a Prop gain by increasing the WG duty cycle values for lower boost targets. Open loop doesn't work with TPS-based boost control though, which is something I can't do without anymore.
 
My core is 63mm thick, about the same width as the rad and about 10cm taller. My ic pipes are also bigger at 2.75 and 3.0 inches. My air intake line is also longer and has more bends which may not help. First I ran open loop, now I run closed loop. The onset of boost is the same. The Motec guy set this up there is no way I want to mess with that.
 
I completely understand you don't want to touch the settings now that the car is finally running great - we will always have time for more tuning talks in the future :)

Is it out of place to ask for a video of an acceleration run, though? ;)
 
Yes thom indeed I need some time to soak it all up and enjoy the car. However I think we agree there is a restriction here to address at the top end which will get more attention in due course :)

What do you want to see on the acceleration run, just the clocks?
 
Rev counter and speedo would be nice, just to get an idea, but don't get out of your way just for that!
 
Wow, that sounds awesome..................PS: your dizzy cap has fallen off - replace it and you`ll get even more [;)]
 
ORIGINAL: Hilux
PS: your dizzy cap has fallen off - replace it and you`ll get even more [;)]

Looks like 2 plug leads are missing too, could explain why some juice is missing up top. Still, 200.5hp per cylinder is nothing to sneer at...!
 

ORIGINAL: TTM

ORIGINAL: Hilux
PS: your dizzy cap has fallen off - replace it and you`ll get even more [;)]

Looks like 2 plug leads are missing too, could explain why some juice is missing up top. Still, 200.5hp per cylinder is nothing to sneer at...!

Haha you guys are funny i need to get a Plate made up for that :)
 
Thanks Tim I am looking forward to getting out and about in my car now it is mostly complete! I am watching your progress with great interest as you are coming at it from a new angle and I am sure we will all learn a lot from it. It will be interesting to see your mods to the cooling system and what you eventually settle on as the right power level for the installed engine. Your numbers makes my dyno chart look quite tame :) Just when you think its all going quiet on the high power motor scene your project pops up out of nowhere!
 


Yes, there are quite a few interesting builds going on at the moment. Those guys in the US running offset grind cranks have also been joined by Duke in Sweden on his racecar. Thom with his 3L and awesome engine bay with the new intake. There are a few guys down here running larger motors with success as well. I hope to be on the dyno within 6 weeks.
Above and beyond that Nick, yes, just enjoy the car now for a while. Sometimes we put so much effort into them that we lose sight of the objective. Hope you guys have a good Summer. [:)]

 

ORIGINAL: nick_968

Thanks Tim I am looking forward to getting out and about in my car now it is mostly complete! I am watching your progress with great interest as you are coming at it from a new angle and I am sure we will all learn a lot from it. It will be interesting to see your mods to the cooling system and what you eventually settle on as the right power level for the installed engine. Your numbers makes my dyno chart look quite tame :) Just when you think its all going quiet on the high power motor scene your project pops up out of nowhere!

Nick, your car is done and on the road, mine as got a long way to go yet. The engine as still got to finish the dyno time and even though its all looking good, there still time for it to go tits up. Loads of horse power is ok but getting it on the floor is another story. Rule of thumb with the Cosworths is 500/550 is more than plenty and a right handful in a two wheel drive car.
 
glad to see this finished nick! would love to see the car at some point if your in the area. make sure u upload some videos for us to see!

nick
 

Posts made and opinions expressed are those of the individual forum members

Use of the Forum is subject to the Terms and Conditions

Disclaimer

The opinions expressed on this site are not necessarily those of the Club, who shall have no liability in respect of them or the accuracy of the content. The Club assumes no responsibility for any effects arising from errors or omissions.

Porsche Club Great Britain gives no warranties, guarantees or assurances and makes no representations or recommendations regarding any goods or services advertised on this site. It is the responsibility of visitors to satisfy themselves that goods and/or services supplied by any advertiser are bona fide and in no instance can the Porsche Club Great Britain be held responsible.

When responding to advertisements please ensure that you satisfy yourself of any applicable call charges on numbers not prefixed by usual "landline" STD Codes. Information can be obtained from the operator or the white pages. Before giving out ANY information regarding cars, or any other items for sale, please satisfy yourself that any potential purchaser is bona fide.

Directors of the Board of Porsche Club GB, Club Office Staff, Register Secretaries and Regional Organisers are often requested by Club members to provide information on matters connected with their cars and other matters referred to in the Club Rules. Such information, advice and assistance provided by such persons is given in good faith and is based on the personal experience and knowledge of the individual concerned.

Neither Porsche Club GB, nor any of the aforementioned, shall be under any liability in respect of any such information, advice or assistance given to members. Members are advised to consult qualified specialists for information, advice and assistance on matters connected with their cars at all times.

Back
Top