The answer for RMS problems?
- Thread starter Guest
- Start date
This is the text from the link:
2001 C4 Rear Main Seal leaks
Question
From reviewing your site, it seems that there have been problems with certain representative vehicles of this class concerning the Rear Main Engine Seals. Your correspondence with Joel Reiser indicated that "go/no-go" gauge might be employed by the dealer to determine engine viability. Where can I find out more about this reference so that I can discuss it with my Service Manager. I just got my C4 back from such a repair, but no mention of such a guage and measurement. Thank you
Answer
I know of no further written reference, this is a factory tool that some of the better dealers have recently become aware of.
The issue is as follows. The crankshaft is sealed by the RMS. The crankshaft rides in a cradle inside the crankcase. Some engines not representative of the class, but specifically defective, had a cradle that was misaligned relative to the case. Therefore the crankshaft rode off-center in the bore which was to be sealed by the RMS. One could argue that the hole was off-center; the result was the same, it would never seal unless corrected. Correction requires a total engine rebuild and/or at Porsche's discretion they could elect to replace such engines at their expense with new or factory remanufactured units. This replacement is what they have been doing, and this behavior has been nothing short of exemplary in these tough times.
If your car has had the RMS replaced once, and it continues to leak, they may replace it a second time to be certain, or they can just use the gauge, and then the engine will have to be replaced. The go/no-go gauge tells them whether the crankshaft centering is in or out of specification.
Joel Reiser - PCA WebSite - 3/13/2004
Unfortunately although it is nice to have the information, I don't see how it will help - It has been known for a while that engines in the US have been replaced due to repeated RMS failures. Unfortunately Porsche Cars GB do not have the same policy.
Guest
New member
I can't access this - presumably because I am not a registered PCA member?
the link was incomplete - you need this:
http://www.pca.org/tech/tech_qa_question.asp?id={B738E959-75EE-4A34-A8A4-F932CFBE81F2}
Guest
New member
ORIGINAL: Mark Bennett
Unfortunately although it is nice to have the information, I don't see how it will help - It has been known for a while that engines in the US have been replaced due to repeated RMS failures. Unfortunately Porsche Cars GB do not have the same policy.
Mark
My point in all of this (and I am getting to a point of almost being embarrassed about raising the subject) is that our Club could (if we get it together) put pressure (or simply ask) Porsche to firstly help us to understand the problems (the above reference from PCA site appears to me to be the answer) and secondly, why are we being treated differently than users elsewhere i.e. how many members have had repeated RMS seal changes whereas others have the engine swapped.
I have written to Jeff on how we get it together and am awaiting a response.
I am prepared to offer whatever help in collating / drafting letters if that is an issue.
What I do not want to see is members endlessly forking out for replacement RMS when it is clear that no amount of new seals will cure what is an inherent fault in some of our pride and joys.
At the moment, my interest is purely academic. My wife's 2000 Boxster S has never had an RMS failure (touch wood) and my 2002 996 had its replaced under warranty at 3000 miles. However, there is clearly a problem and, for anyone who has had multiple RMS failures, it seems quite serious.
As I said in the past, with Porsches ambitious sales figures for new vehicles, more and more owners (Club Members) will be dependent upon their relationship with Porsche Cars and the OPC network. The Club must recognise this and offer the confidence to its members that they have the lines of communication necessary to be able to act on their (collective) behalf when it is appropriate. If the Club doesn't do it, who will?
I'll be watching this space.....
Guest
New member
On boxa.net we did a quick poll, and 17 cars owners out of a response of 51 said they have had the RMS replaced. One car has had 3 replaced in succession.
This IS an issue that the Club can and should address with P_cars_GB.
Whilst it was done under warranty, I know people who have had to pay. It really is unacceptable to have a known problem still causing problems some 7 years after car launch.
My driveway looks unsightly with the resultant oil drips - a situation I will also have to deal with this weekend. [
1. If they are a subsequent owner
2. If the dealer replaced it under warranty at a routine service
3. If they are non-technical and don't take any interest in the details of any mechanical work (ie my wife).
Guest
New member
If it helps over the last couple of weeks I have been emailing Jeff our Club Communications Director to get a better understanding on how the Club interrelate with Porsche over any issue that has an affect on problems that members suffer such as RMS.
Seemingly there is no protocol existing presently to bring such matters to the notice of Porsche but Jeff has indicated his intent to raise the issue at today's Board Meeting of the Club - subject of course to the agenda and time permitting. I await a response.
Personally I think the matter, which affects Boxster and 996 owners, is important, and ultimately will bring about a lessening of car prices as time goes by unless a resolution is found.[
From the Porsche Club America website this seems to be happening where changes of complete engines occur if a first fix of a new seal fails to cure the problem.[
As I see it our problem is how do we get enough fellow members to take part in "˜keeping the pot boiling' "" without being judgmental, the response to the issue of "˜Waving' between members attracts by comparison huge audiences as compared to the RMS issue which may ultimately cost our members in financial terms.[8|]
I await any thoughts.
Guest
New member
The main purpose of an owners club is to represent the interest of the owners (we just happen to have a load of fun and technical exchanges too [
GreigM
New member
I have my thoughts on buying a 2nd hand 996 maybe next year (once the 997 is out and depreciation works its magic [
Guest
New member
The update is that my RMS is not leaking however there has been some oil "misting" in that area but Porsche Reading cannot say for certain as to why. While there is no obvious source, there have been no fresh drops of oil on my garage floor for three weeks. I did top up the oil about 2 months ago with a 1/4 L so perhaps a crankcase breather has been venting a slight excess.
On the geometry side, the suspension has been set up with the fronts needing a fair bit of toe-in adjustment which accounts for the uneven wear on the old set of tyres. Porsche Reading also gave the car a thorough clean both inside and out.
I suppose that's fair enough.
Taz
Guest
New member
BTW. you and I know each other.
I had a chat with Chiswick's senior technician about this problem. As far as he is concerned, OPC's should fix this problem FOC if your car is out of warranty AND you have maintained the correct service schedule. If you have not had your car serviced as per the official service schedule then the OPC may charge you to fix this problem.
This is my personal view also. I have had RMS replaced on two out of my three Boxsters and am a little concerned for future depreciation as the cars age. I have no special pull with Reading, but will see if we can make it a Club enquiry. I think I will have to do a formal survey of members to present a convincing picture, not that Porsche Cars aren't aware of the scale of the problem

Posts made and opinions expressed are those of the individual forum members
Use of the Forum is subject to the Terms and Conditions
Disclaimer
The opinions expressed on this site are not necessarily those of the Club, who shall have no liability in respect of them or the accuracy of the content. The Club assumes no responsibility for any effects arising from errors or omissions.
Porsche Club Great Britain gives no warranties, guarantees or assurances and makes no representations or recommendations regarding any goods or services advertised on this site. It is the responsibility of visitors to satisfy themselves that goods and/or services supplied by any advertiser are bona fide and in no instance can the Porsche Club Great Britain be held responsible.
When responding to advertisements please ensure that you satisfy yourself of any applicable call charges on numbers not prefixed by usual "landline" STD Codes. Information can be obtained from the operator or the white pages. Before giving out ANY information regarding cars, or any other items for sale, please satisfy yourself that any potential purchaser is bona fide.
Directors of the Board of Porsche Club GB, Club Office Staff, Register Secretaries and Regional Organisers are often requested by Club members to provide information on matters connected with their cars and other matters referred to in the Club Rules. Such information, advice and assistance provided by such persons is given in good faith and is based on the personal experience and knowledge of the individual concerned.
Neither Porsche Club GB, nor any of the aforementioned, shall be under any liability in respect of any such information, advice or assistance given to members. Members are advised to consult qualified specialists for information, advice and assistance on matters connected with their cars at all times.