You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Fuel Pressure Regulator
- Thread starter Guest
- Start date
Tony
Guest
New member
Any thoughts?
Guest
New member
Change the pipe to one from an earlier car and save the original one intact with the original FPR?
That might just be the best solution yet to be honest. Its a real pain casue the onl ytime i can get to looka t thecar is the weekend when its light, so it take a full week before anything can get done. I assume the pipe is fairly easy to fit. i.e. i dont have to go under the car (or need a ramp) If so i might order a pipe for a per 90 car from OPC and go down that route.
The plot thickens. I am still not convinced about all the tech stuff that is flying about, unfortunatly i dont know enought about it.
I can see that a pump has to be more powerful to maintain a given flow rate at a higher pressure but surely if it maxes out with a 3.8 bar regulator it will flow it's max volume at a pressure of less than 3.8 bar, not achieve 3.8 bar but flow less volume? Net result is the same in that it doesn't supply sufficient fuel into the cylinder though.
I was reading Danno's description (admittedly 18 months old) of how a boost enhancer works and his understanding of pressure was plain wrong (here if you're interested) which makes me slightly cautious about believing him on technical stuff. That said I trust that he has seen the results he says he has on dynos and his chips work successfully with a 3 bar regulator.
I guess I just mentally added a new fuel pump to my (growing) list of mods...
Tony
ORIGINAL: slim_boy_fat
So the best solution would be to keept hestandard FPR (might not get full performance ) but atleast will get proper fuel supply and not over stress the fuel pump.
That sounds like the safest option to me untill the regulator can be found. Or the pipe changed as you suggested.
Potentially that would underfuel for the boost. The chips are coded to expect 3.0 bar so will operate the injector duty cycle to suit.
That said my car was set up on a rolling road with a custom map (by Bob Watson) and he was surprised that the standard fuel system was sufficient. The difference there was that he tailored the duty cycle of my injectors to suit what I had. In other words the stock system may well be enough, but Danno has blown the chips to suit increased fuel pressure so they aren't set up expecting the stock set up.
I am reasonably certain Wayne at chip wizards also recommends the S2 FPR if you do not fit an adjustable unit when running the DPW (or squeezing the 2.5bar unit in a vice but thats not add that complication!). The other thing I have been thinking about is how does the damper on the other end of the fuel rail affect things?
Questions, questions, questions .........
Tony
Diver944
Active member
ORIGINAL: 944Turbo
Its also interesting that our moderator (unless I am mistaken) has a Danno supplied push fit 3 bar FPR and yet it gives 3.8 bar fuel pressure when at Idle.
Wow, I haven't got time to digest all this just now [&:] but I've just been out with a torch (in the rain [8|] ) to double check and my Danno supplied FPR is marked as 3.0 Bosch which is the same as on my S2.
I've just read section 24-104 of the factory workshop manuals for 944 S2 and it does say that with the DME bridged to make the fuel pump run permanenetly, but with the engine STOPPED the FPR should read 3.8 bar, at IDLE it should read 3.3 bar.
My garage told me I was making 3.8bar and I just presumed that was at idle, I am willing to bet now they were talking about the former - apologies if I have caused confusion [&:]
Guest
New member
And it actually runs at 3.3bar at idle! So does this mean that the 3.0 bar ones would run 2.5-2.6 at idle?
More questions.
Surely 3.3bar would be fine to use. Considering all the other possible restrictions and inconsistencies 0.3bar extra is not much.
All the way back round to just fitting the S2 FPR again.
Round and round we go!!

Posts made and opinions expressed are those of the individual forum members
Use of the Forum is subject to the Terms and Conditions
Disclaimer
The opinions expressed on this site are not necessarily those of the Club, who shall have no liability in respect of them or the accuracy of the content. The Club assumes no responsibility for any effects arising from errors or omissions.
Porsche Club Great Britain gives no warranties, guarantees or assurances and makes no representations or recommendations regarding any goods or services advertised on this site. It is the responsibility of visitors to satisfy themselves that goods and/or services supplied by any advertiser are bona fide and in no instance can the Porsche Club Great Britain be held responsible.
When responding to advertisements please ensure that you satisfy yourself of any applicable call charges on numbers not prefixed by usual "landline" STD Codes. Information can be obtained from the operator or the white pages. Before giving out ANY information regarding cars, or any other items for sale, please satisfy yourself that any potential purchaser is bona fide.
Directors of the Board of Porsche Club GB, Club Office Staff, Register Secretaries and Regional Organisers are often requested by Club members to provide information on matters connected with their cars and other matters referred to in the Club Rules. Such information, advice and assistance provided by such persons is given in good faith and is based on the personal experience and knowledge of the individual concerned.
Neither Porsche Club GB, nor any of the aforementioned, shall be under any liability in respect of any such information, advice or assistance given to members. Members are advised to consult qualified specialists for information, advice and assistance on matters connected with their cars at all times.