As well as keeping bailiffs busy, a global recession in the early 1990s hit Porsche’s bottom line. People weren’t buying 911s and the company had to think of ways to stay afloat. After seeking advice on cost-effective product development from Toyota, Porsche embarked on building two models that could share a host of panels: the next 911, the 996, and a new, cheaper and less powerful roadster, the 986.
In an attempt to prevent the stablemates from looking too similar, Porsche tailored the dimensions, proportions and engine position of each. The roadster was slightly shorter, underscoring its status as the junior partner, but it had a longer wheelbase and a more compact rear overhang, resulting in a more sprightly profile. While the 996 retained the rear-engined set up of its predecessors, the roadster’s lump was mounted amidships, leaving space for a long and roomy boot.
Porsche launched the smaller car in 1996, naming it ‘Boxster’ in a portmanteau of ‘Boxer’ for its flat 2.5-litre six-cylinder engine and ‘Speedster’. Although not all fans of the marque were convinced, it soon started flying out of showrooms.
THE BOXSTER CONCEPT
The 986 had been in development for a couple of years before the world was given a taste of what the production car would look like. Penned by Grant Larson under the supervision of Porsche’s then-Design Chief Harm Lagaay, the Boxster concept was influenced by the fabled 1955 550 Spyder. Debuting at the 1993 North American International Auto Show in Detroit, its sleek, low-slung body was greeted with widespread acclaim.
Cloaked in ethereal silver, the showstopper fulfilled its brief perfectly, effortlessly channelling the mystique of the car that inspired it while appearing unquestionably modern. Whereas the Spyder’s front fenders and rear haunch were dramatic statements, those of the concept were more delicately handled. At the same time, the prototype had an athletic forward-leaning stance, giving it greater urgency than the Spyder. The overall feel of the exterior chimed brilliantly with the cultural milieu of the early 1990s, a period which was recoiling from the shoulder-padded excesses of the previous decade.
Up until the show car’s appearance, the headlights of every road-going Porsche had been either round or ovoid. The lighting units had also always been separated from the indicators, with the former taking centre stage on the front fender or bonnet while the latter minded their own business on the bumper. The Boxster concept did away with convention, combining beams and indicators in a new shape which came to be christened ‘the fried egg headlight’.
It’s difficult to overstate how controversial this feature was for aficionados. They reluctantly accepted it because the car was only a concept and concepts are supposed to be a bit wacky. And, even if Porsche did go ahead and install these lights on a production car, they would feature solely on a roadster. Surely the beloved 911 would never be blighted with them as well… right?
The combined lighting units presented issues at Porsche HQ. Evicting the indicators could have resulted in a rather blank-looking bumper, so Larson emboldened the grille with chunky inserts. The rear lights took on an even more radical shape. They were so much more playful than anything we’d seen from Porsche, rounding off a wonderfully daring and optimistic-feeling exterior.
The design of the interior picked up on the exterior’s friskiness and went doolally with it, contrasting salmony, fleshy-feeling leather upholstery with bubbly silver plastic panelling. Somehow, the space was both stripped back – referencing the spartan interior of the 550 Spyder – and totally overwhelmed the senses. A giant piece of leather lay across the top of the dashboard like a diplodocus’ tongue and all the obligatory buttons were haphazardly arranged beside a monitor in a zone that looked very much like the back of an early digital camera. It’s incredible to think that designers were predicting that infotainment screens would take centre stage in car interiors all those years ago and, although the slightly mystical ’90s vibe hasn’t aged all that well, the focus on screen-based interaction is very much with us.
THE PRODUCTION 986 BOXSTER
As well as needing the photogenic charm of the show car, the production Boxster had to make economic sense. To lower the development budget, the 986 shares its doors, bonnet and front wings with the 996. Co-use of the latter in particular contributed to the road-going Boxster having a noticeably different character to the prototype. While the show car’s front fenders are a little pinched at their crowns, those of the 986 are softer. To ensure a coherent aesthetic, Porsche also smudged the rear haunch. The rear overhang grew too, leaving the roadster with a bulky back end. The combination of softness and hindquarters-spread resulted in a somewhat slouchy demeanour, which enthusiasts didn’t go in for. I’ve always liked its laid-back feel, though.
Famously, the Boxster also lent its front lighting units to the entry-level 996, creating a furore in the media and plenty of disquiet among devotees when the latter landed in 1997. The hoo-hah only subsided when the Carrera received a facelift five years later, adopting the Turbo’s headlamps. In the same year, the 986’s front lights were tweaked. The offending cover was replaced and the units became far less yolky. This, for me at least, took away some of the charm of the first-generation Boxster.
A close look at the bumper shutlines of both the prototype and the 986 gives away some subtle design modifications that took place in the production process. The concept’s front bumper shutline is quite wavy, but the 986’s is more regimented. This alteration reflects the change in styling of all the panels and elements that meet to form the shutline. Also, the 986’s grille has been stretched sideways and takes up more surface area, making the roadster’s front end seem wider and more sure-footed. The shape of the rear lights evolved too, becoming more horizontal and making the back end appear more planted. You’ll no doubt also notice that the rear bumper’s shutline has been straightened out as well.
Other production revisions included giving the windscreen a body-coloured surround, shrinking the wheels a little and (thankfully) removing the rivets from the rims. They detracted from the purity of the prototype and the production alloys are far more refined. Wisely, Porsche stuck with the centrally mounted exhaust – a satisfying defining feature.
The requirement to use the same doors as the 996 gave the designers a chance to iron out one particularly awkward-looking patch: the sill. On the concept, a scoop behind and beneath the door houses the air intake. This feature breaks the continuity of the light catcher that would otherwise flow above the door shutline and onwards towards the rear wheel arch. As a result, the whole area looks quite busy. Relocating the air intake to a higher position erased this issue and also reduced the prospect of road detritus going anywhere near it. Stick-on sill butchery was left to aftermarket suppliers.
The 986’s interior also shared components with the fifth-generation 911, though the common parts aren’t easy to spot. In-cabin materials and finishes are very much spec-specific and can differ a lot between models, which can make it difficult to compare panels effectively. Shared parts including door panelling and the centre console did mean that the design of shared elements had to suit both models, so the curves and swirls which so characterised the Boxster concept’s interior are more retrained in the 986. This is probably a good thing. Incredibly, though, the meaty piece of leather that sat atop the driver’s instrument panel in the prototype’s cabin makes an appearance in the production roadster, albeit in a more integrated and well-behaved manner. The 986’s interior also acquired a roll bar behind each seat; a necessary feature in a time before reinforced windscreen surrounds and active rollover protection became commonplace.
.jpg "P01_0051_a4-(1).jpg")
THE 986’S LEGACY
Close to 16,000 986s found homes in the first year of production and, by the time the first-generation car was put out to pasture in 2004, more than 164,000 units had been built. Given the criticism from enthusiasts, that’s an incredible achievement.
Having become more solvent, Porsche accomplished with the second-generation Boxster what it couldn’t quite realise with its predecessor. The 2005 model had a far breezier demeanour, in no small part thanks to more defined front fenders and rear haunches. It was also joined by the hard-topped Cayman, which has since evolved alongside its sibling.
The following Boxster, the 981, moved the brief on a little and came across as weightier and more serious. The current roadster has muscles on top of its muscles. Surely, there’s no way that the forthcoming fifth-generation car can get any more hench? My feeling is that the next Boxster, which is set to be an EV, will revisit and reinterpret the spryness of the concept that kicked off this amazing journey. I hope that fried egg headlights are on the menu too.
This feature was written by Dr Aysar Ghassan and first appeared in the June2025 issue of our monthly Club magazine, Porsche Post. to receive your copy, as well as enjoying a host of exclusive member benefits and savings.
Dr Aysar Ghassan began his career as an automotive designer at Alfa Romeo and Mitsubishi. Today, he leads the MA in Automotive and Transport Design course at Coventry University.