Menu toggle

Cayman GT4 and Other 981 Suspension Settings

ralphmusic

PCGB Member
Member
I thought it might be useful to start a thread on suspension settings, which seems to be a learning process for all new owners, particularly of GT4s. We all know the GT4's limited adjustability is frustrating so perhaps an exchange of facts around what is possible and how to expand the possibilities might be the most useful focus for contributions.

Whilst the GT4 has suspension more adjustable than the 'cooking' versions, there are constraints particularly at the rear where the GT4 rear toe control arm (tca) has adjustment limited by the eccentric nut and which is exactly the same dimensions as the standard part. The GT4 rear top mount is offset (i.e. the damper attaches off centre) and this is different to the standard arrangement. This became evident when Centre Gravity were installing an adjustable set-up on my CS including GT4 top mounts, these created additional neg. camber and because of the angles, moved the tyre too close to the diagonal control arm (dcc) when running 11.0" wheels. As of today, my (car's) rear has Tarett central top mounts and 997RS wishbones with shims (with RSS tca) and clearances are OK. The front has RSS wishbones with shims, GT3 top mounts, GT4 roll bar and Tarett drop links. Dampers are Damptronics with Eibach helper and main springs, the spring rates being 51 and 63 N/mm. The GT4's are 45 and 80 N/mm per Evo AP video.

Anyway having explained where my car is 'coming from' and on the basis that there must be some commonalities across the 981 Cayman platform..

I had been running with a lot of neg. camber (3:20 F and 3:12 R) with 0:02 F total toe and 0:20 R total toe and (GT4) roll bars set to the mid position. There was no tramlining, rear was a little light on trail braking and a little squirrelly on heavy breaking from high speed. Otherwise the car was very stable and faster than previously with 2:00 F and 1:75 R camber, and H&R roll bars set to soft on the rear. Tyres then and now are MPSS 245 and 295 on 8.5" and 11.0" wheels.

Talking with Chris, it seemed a good idea to keep front : rear camber similar, but reduce from the previous high levels, to slightly increase toe, and to go soft on the rear roll bar. Camber changes were to balance out grip v tyre wear, toe to help braking stability and with roll bar, to help with traction on a few occasions where it could be improved. The car was set up with 90kg 'driver' weights, full fuel tank and 7kg luggage loading, cross weights were 780kg each diagonal. Ride height was set at 103mm/130mm and 0.5 degree rake.

The car now has front 2:30 neg camber and 0:04 total toe, and rear 2:12 neg camber and 0:30 total toe. I have not been on track yet so I won't really know how it feels in extremis until March 22/23 at Silverstone and Goodwood, respectively.

It'll be interesting to hear how well David's changes work at Donnington and to get some tyre temp/pressure data. Whilst my car and MPSS are a different package, his and my experiences will give some ranging data which might inform and encourage others' developments.

Finally, the picture below shows the base settings for the Clubsport (on 18" slicks of course but interesting nevertheless).

Scan%20GT4%20Clubsport.jpg


Contributions welcome!
 
I was told that I could get a little more camber by reducing my ride height, but decided to leave it as is.

Once I have worn out my first set of tyres I'll have a better idea of what is really happening.

So far, the car feels to be working well ...

 
Chris, I don't know if you are going but Chris Franklin said he was taking a car to the RS day at Oulton on Friday.

 
Well my parts arrived :) so 8mm shims up front and new tarret Rear toe links to go on. with locking plates also.

aiming for -2.3 up front and only -1.8 at the back to start with, no front toe and more rear toe than standard to stop rear wobble, but I have also rear monoballs to also help stop rear steer.

I am keeping rear ARB hard atm as I hate understeer, but of course if traction is an issue then might change back, but not after top times more how it drives on the road, I want a solid front end with maybe a bit of rear fun, so hard bar to stop roll hence the rear camber a bit less, also less rear camber out the bends give more tyre contact patch for traction.

once I have done donnington and got some pyro results can go from there. But mine is a road car 95% and will only see maybe 5 track days in 2016.

would love to do ride heights but I cannot get off my drive as it is, so that will stay stock.

As a road car only having the rear ARB on hard has been great on stock geo.

 
A video courtesy of Porsche Club America on the Cayman Clubsport

[link=https://www.youtube.com/embed/D2tpqSfH_B4]https://www.youtube.com/embed/D2tpqSfH_B4[/link]

 
ralphmusic said:
Chris, I don't know if you are going but Chris Franklin said he was taking a car to the RS day at Oulton on Friday.

Yes, going ... is Chris taking a GT4 ?

 
I assume he will take his 1970's stripped out track car (with a PCGB Modified Register sticker), unless he takes his wife's Boxster or the company VW Up.

 
ralphmusic said:
I had been running with a lot of neg. camber (3:20 F and 3:12 R) with 0:02 F total toe and 0:20 R total toe and (GT4) roll bars set to the mid position. There was no tramlining, rear was a little light on trail braking and a little squirrelly on heavy breaking from high speed. Otherwise the car was very stable and faster than previously with 2:00 F and 1:75 R camber, and H&R roll bars set to soft on the rear. Tyres then and now are MPSS 245 and 295 on 8.5" and 11.0" wheels.

Talking with Chris, it seemed a good idea to keep front : rear camber similar, but reduce from the previous high levels, to slightly increase toe, and to go soft on the rear roll bar. Camber changes were to balance out grip v tyre wear, toe to help braking stability and with roll bar, to help with traction on a few occasions where it could be improved. The car was set up with 90kg 'driver' weights, full fuel tank and 7kg luggage loading, cross weights were 780kg each diagonal. Ride height was set at 103mm/130mm and 0.5 degree rake.

The car now has front 2:30 neg camber and 0:04 total toe, and rear 2:12 neg camber and 0:30 total toe. I have not been on track yet so I won't really know how it feels in extremis until March 22/23 at Silverstone and Goodwood, respectively.

Interesting to hear about soo much camber! -3º is a helluva lot with even semi slicks on a low profile. I was thinking in the region of -2º all round. Your setting look very similar to my old S2000 which is interesting too. The thing is, you can always trade front static camber for a bit more caster and achieve dynamic camber. This is a decent idea as for low speed you get oversteer but at high speed you'll have a bit more front wash as you don't get the steering angle. I'm fortunate enough to have access to geo equipment but ideally need to find some adapters for the Haweka clamps - if anyone knows of anyone...! Next are dampers. I was looking at the X73 kit from Suncoast, but you're looking at £1800 by the time it gets over here even if they do come with ARBs. Bilstein B16/PSS10s are currently £1650 as they have 20% off until end of August. Obviously there are KWv3 (£2200) and the yanks rave on about JRZs. Nitrons are too expensive as are AST as good as they are. Anything else anyone can think of? Finally adjustable lower arms. GT3 options are out at £800 each. Eibach do a set of adjustable ones for about £600 for the pair. Has anyone had a go of them?

 
Rocket_Rabbit said:
ralphmusic said:
I had been running with a lot of neg. camber (3:20 F and 3:12 R) with 0:02 F total toe and 0:20 R total toe and (GT4) roll bars set to the mid position. There was no tramlining, rear was a little light on trail braking and a little squirrelly on heavy breaking from high speed. Otherwise the car was very stable and faster than previously with 2:00 F and 1:75 R camber, and H&R roll bars set to soft on the rear. Tyres then and now are MPSS 245 and 295 on 8.5" and 11.0" wheels.

Talking with Chris, it seemed a good idea to keep front : rear camber similar, but reduce from the previous high levels, to slightly increase toe, and to go soft on the rear roll bar. Camber changes were to balance out grip v tyre wear, toe to help braking stability and with roll bar, to help with traction on a few occasions where it could be improved. The car was set up with 90kg 'driver' weights, full fuel tank and 7kg luggage loading, cross weights were 780kg each diagonal. Ride height was set at 103mm/130mm and 0.5 degree rake.

The car now has front 2:30 neg camber and 0:04 total toe, and rear 2:12 neg camber and 0:30 total toe. I have not been on track yet so I won't really know how it feels in extremis until March 22/23 at Silverstone and Goodwood, respectively.

Interesting to hear about soo much camber! -3º is a helluva lot with even semi slicks on a low profile. I was thinking in the region of -2º all round. Your setting look very similar to my old S2000 which is interesting too. The thing is, you can always trade front static camber for a bit more caster and achieve dynamic camber. This is a decent idea as for low speed you get oversteer but at high speed you'll have a bit more front wash as you don't get the steering angle. I'm fortunate enough to have access to geo equipment but ideally need to find some adapters for the Haweka clamps - if anyone knows of anyone...! Next are dampers. I was looking at the X73 kit from Suncoast, but you're looking at £1800 by the time it gets over here even if they do come with ARBs. Bilstein B16/PSS10s are currently £1650 as they have 20% off until end of August. Obviously there are KWv3 (£2200) and the yanks rave on about JRZs. Nitrons are too expensive as are AST as good as they are. Anything else anyone can think of? Finally adjustable lower arms. GT3 options are out at £800 each. Eibach do a set of adjustable ones for about £600 for the pair. Has anyone had a go of them?

Thread resurrection! Shows the benefits of using the search function.. Anyway after the "2:30" settings referred to above, we went back up again and finally settled on:

Front 3:10' with 0.04' total toe and rear 2:40' and total toe of 0:30' running on Cup2 tyres. Tyre wear and temperatures are good (>0.5mm and around 8 degrees) across tread.

BUT:

1. There is a range of error/difference in measurement in all quoted settings - unless the settings are set or changed on the same regularly calibrated rig by the same competent operator there will be differences which may incorrectly suggest a different "philosophy"

2. Driving styles are different and may require different settings

3. ARB settings also come into the equation and do tyre type, tread depth and condition

4. Dampers/spring rates/rake is rarely mentioned

Anyway to your questions:

Dampers, Bilstein dampers respond to PASM/DSC inputs in around 100ms and do not respond mid-stroke. This means that if you fit DSC controller which fires instructions out at around 10ms, you don't get best results from that combination of damper and controller. DSC Sport (TPC Racing) supply Tractive Dampers which respond both mid-stroke and in around 10ms. There may be others offering similar performance

Do you want to manually set 2 or 3-way dampers or have a computer do it? I used DSC to replace PASM as I wanted something I could set separately for road v track and not have to adjust manually for each type of use. Plus I wanted better road use compliance which I got with DSC.

I have no direct knowledge of non-active dampers.

I used RSS split wishbones at the front and managed to find an unused pair of GT3RS rears for £500 on eBay.

My dampers and spring rates were:

Bilstein B16 Damptronic

Eibach springs:

FRONT

Main - ERS 170-60-60

Helper - ERS 40-60-40

REAR

Main - ERS 140-60-80

Helper - ERS 40-60-50

I fitted GT4 ARBs

The car weighed around 1430kg DIN

Hope that helps.

Ralph

 
Cheers RM. I'll be going passive dampers as I have plent of experience setting them up. Might well pick up some ARBs whilst I'm at it as they make a decent difference to handling and are easy to adjust at the track.

 
I have a spare used set F & R KW sway bars for 981 cooking versions. Two position which is one more than stock and one less than GT4 versions. New bushes would be required but if interested £50 + 'postage' - 'they are long and not very light' I am in Devon, East of Exeter.

I also have other 981 bits and pieces, some of which may be of interest:

Used Parts

OEM:

PASM dampers and springs on standard top mounts (F & R)

PASM Control Unit

Front wishbones (pair)

Rear wishbones (pair)

Front drop links (pair)

Front and rear CS anti-roll bars

GT4 rear top mounts

Non-OEM Parts:

Front and rear KW anti-roll bars (as above)

Unused Parts

Bilstein Damptronic springs

GT4 rear toe links

GT4 rear drop links

Wheel & Tyre Set Never Mounted on Car

Victor Equipment Baden 20" wheels

Front 8.5" ET45, Rear 11.0" ET55 but effective ET48 with 7mm spacers

Fitted Michelin Pilot Super Sport 245/35 & 295/30

 

Posts made and opinions expressed are those of the individual forum members

Use of the Forum is subject to the Terms and Conditions

Disclaimer

The opinions expressed on this site are not necessarily those of the Club, who shall have no liability in respect of them or the accuracy of the content. The Club assumes no responsibility for any effects arising from errors or omissions.

Porsche Club Great Britain gives no warranties, guarantees or assurances and makes no representations or recommendations regarding any goods or services advertised on this site. It is the responsibility of visitors to satisfy themselves that goods and/or services supplied by any advertiser are bona fide and in no instance can the Porsche Club Great Britain be held responsible.

When responding to advertisements please ensure that you satisfy yourself of any applicable call charges on numbers not prefixed by usual "landline" STD Codes. Information can be obtained from the operator or the white pages. Before giving out ANY information regarding cars, or any other items for sale, please satisfy yourself that any potential purchaser is bona fide.

Directors of the Board of Porsche Club GB, Club Office Staff, Register Secretaries and Regional Organisers are often requested by Club members to provide information on matters connected with their cars and other matters referred to in the Club Rules. Such information, advice and assistance provided by such persons is given in good faith and is based on the personal experience and knowledge of the individual concerned.

Neither Porsche Club GB, nor any of the aforementioned, shall be under any liability in respect of any such information, advice or assistance given to members. Members are advised to consult qualified specialists for information, advice and assistance on matters connected with their cars at all times.

Back
Top