Menu toggle

Flat Four Flop

daro911

PCGB Member
Member
https://www.carthrottle.com/post/slow-sales-and-flat-six-718s-prove-buyers-expect-more-from-porsche/

When you think of Porsche, you think of driving dynamics, sublimely set-up driver’s cars and nape-prickling noise. Cars that give you the James May fizz. Take away one of those attributes and you risk the overall house of cards, so delicately built over decades, tumbling like a cheese wheel down a Gloucestershire hillside.

That’s effectively what Porsche did when it developed the then-new 718 Boxster and Cayman. Doing away with the howling but not especially low-emission six-cylinder engines and replacing them with two turbocharged flat-fours, just 2.0 and 2.5 litres respectively, was a huge gamble for a brand built on a certain kind of performance car. It hasn’t paid off.

Right from the earliest press drives it was clear something was out of line. The engines were technically excellent, with no lag at middle-to-high engine speeds and a better chassis than ever before, but something fundamental had gone walkabout. After leaving the launch in early 2016 I described it as the best performance car you can buy - if you’re deaf. Mean, perhaps, but the point is as valid now as it was then. The 718 and 718 S cars are lacking in an area crucial to any Porsche’s appeal.

Porsche was stuck between European emissions laws, the prevalence of a certain Japaese saloon that pretty much owned the modern turbocharged flat-four concept, and the fact that the Porsche brand was, then as now, known and admired for offering something more exotic than the mainstream. It did what it had to do to try to meet emissions regulations without upsetting the apple cart too much, but the truth is that such a vast switch - some would say ‘reduction’ - in character was never likely to go well.

Let’s hit the numbers, first in the US where things have arguably gone worst. From 7292 cars across the Cayman and Boxster 981 ranges in 2014, the total dropped to 6663 in 2015, that line’s last full year on sale and traditionally a slow one. In the overlap year, 2016, the figure was already lower again – 6260 cars. Alarm bells would have been sounding in Stuttgart. Boom: 2017 comes and goes, leaving a figure of only 5087 718s shifted.

It got worse. After a brief and small resurgence with 5276 units sold in the region in 2018, 2019 has seen it dive to just 3880. In Europe the figures peaked in 2016, when both old and new models were on sale, at 9770 cars across both models. Since then the numbers have dropped to 8438, 8202 and most recently 7100 or so – this last figure is estimated as we don’t have figures for December 2019 yet, but it represents a drop to about 650 cars less than the combined Boxster/Cayman figures for the 981’s final full year in 2015.

It’s not quite that simple in Europe, to be fair. The general market for sports cars is collapsing, so to have sold two consecutive years of the 718 at higher numbers than the 981, and to still be selling a number of 718s close to the 2015 mark is actually a pretty good performance under the circumstances. We couldn’t get hold of UK-specific sales figures but a Porsche GB spokesman told us that the 718 was holding its own in a sports car segment that was actually up 13 per cent on these shores, driven by the new BMW Z4 and updated Audi TT. Its market share has stayed similar in the face of the new challengers.

Still, the uncomfortable position for Porsche in its long-standing European and American markets is that the engine swap was too much. The 718 handles better than ever but buyers here aren’t into it in the same way because it lacks the exotic edge of the 981 before it; the edge provided by sound alone. Porsche knows it, too, having fairly urgently reintroduced six-bangers for the (evo Car of the Year-winning) Cayman GT4 and Boxster Spyder. These make up more than half of overall sales in the US, with the balance set to tip even further towards sixes now that a pair of six-cylinder GTS variants has been confirmed.

As Porsche has already explained to Road & Track, the real reason the West was lumbered with a 718 that didn’t cut the sonic mustard is China. It’s much cheaper there to tax a 2.0-litre car with four cylinders than it is to slap the same ticket on a 3.4-litre flat-six, and there’s much less of an issue there with heritage or an expectation of six cylinders. Add to that the increased sales volume potential in a nation of over a billion people, and this side of the world we all suddenly look rather unimportant.

Without the demand from that vast nation we probably wouldn’t have a 718 at all, so perhaps we should be grateful, not grumbling. Maybe, much like building the Cayenne, Panamera and Macan, the 718 is just another one of those ‘wrong’ decisions Porsche is very good at making when the alternative is commercial failure.
 
Great post, most informative.
Never gave a thought to the 'China-effect' which really explains the whole thing.
Graham.
 
An interesting post, but I do feel compelled to counter the fundamental argument, that the "crucial" appeal of a Porsche is the sound of the exhaust. I won't for a nanosecond disagree that the sound of the flat-six can be glorious and can add to the enjoyment but, for me, it's really quite a small part of the overall experience. I truly love driving my Porsche and I'll tell that to anyone that'll listen and a great many that don't want to, but that love of driving comes primarily from the handling, the acceleration and, being perfectly honest, simply because I'm driving a Porsche. I had posters and models of Porsches when I was young and as I got older there was for many years the crushing realisation that I may never be in a position to own one. To look out my window now and see my Porsche, sitting there desperately asking me to drive it, still occasionally surprises me. Each time I do drive feels like the first time and this car is the only one, the only one - of a couple of dozen or so that I've owned over my 35+ years of driving - that I can drive all day for hundreds of miles and still feel happy to jump right back in the seat and set off again. Hardly any of these feelings are solely or even mostly related to the sound that comes from the engine and/or exhaust.

Then there's the elephant in the room. Electricity (and don't worry, there is a relevant argument here, not a rant). Whatever your beliefs, it's clear now that all motor manufacturers see the future as electric. Even if a manufacturer wanted to remain stoically producing fossil-fueled cars, regulations, bans and restrictions, costs and other factors will eventually make them an unrealistic choice for anything other than novelty value, if they were permitted to be sold at all. Porsche themselves already have the Taycan and surely other EV models will follow, perhaps more simply for Porsche than other manufacturers given their, shall we say, "economy" when it comes to model design differences. By all accounts, the Taycan is every bit a Porsche, with some reviewers specifically targeting their review at that question and being happy with the answer. Not only is it an EV Porsche, but it's also a good EV full stop. For example, it's able to launch and accelerate at full "amps" as often as you like while other notable fast EVs can only do it once without having a long lie down. And here's the relevant argument, for me, if I could have the handling, the acceleration and the badge and know that I'm no longer burning fossil fuels, that'd be at least as big a plus point as the sound of the exhaust. At least one reviewer even commented that he liked the sound of the Taycan.

So, if it's not the sound of the engine that prompted this change, what was it? If, as stated, the whole raison d'etre of the 718 was the Chinese market perhaps performance there was disappointing or came with unwelcome costs, etc. I don't know.

Perhaps, though, it came about when a group of engineers sitting in a bar sketching out the new EV model releases, had one more beer and decided they needed a last window-shattering hurrah. Despite my earlier assertions and my bookmarked configuration of a Taycan, I will cautiously admit I now also have a bookmark of a freshly configured GTS 4.0... http://www.porsche-code.com/PLGSF9B3 y'know, just in case...
 
" When you think of Porsche, you think of driving dynamics, sublimely set-up driver’s cars and nape-prickling noise "

… is exactly why I became a first time NA F6 owner four years ago and why I have decided to retain my 2014 MY CS and spend significantly less than `the cost to change` for a 981 GT4 or 982 4.0 GTS on a new warm / hot hatch.

A few contributing factors along the decision route ...

- A two hour `highland` drive in Sport Plus … epic being an understatement, headache was though.
Similar runs are now with the PSE off … no less enjoyable, yet another aural attribute to savour

- Absolutely dire local OPCs`sales depts. communication skills and attitudes

- A local, alternate manufacturer dealer / salesman with a supreme `can do` attitude. A car with far
too much tech. than I will use but with an all alloy - IL4 - twin scroll turbo with antilag - adaptive
suspension - trick diff .... and 420Nm [:)]





 
Some excellent points Jack, and a welcome riposte to the overly vocal resistance to the sound of the F-4T motor. As someone who spent his working life in the field of sound and vibration - much of it vehicle-related - I know that it's very difficult to get a consensus on certain aspects of vehicle noise, so I'm not surprised that the introduction of the F-4T has proved to be so divisive.

Personally, I reckon we should celebrate any characterful engine sounds while we still can. It won't be too long before the IC engine is consigned to the history books, to be replaced by the comparative silence of BEVs (except for wind noise which currently is masked to some degree by powertrain noise).

Jeff


 
I enjoyed both those write-ups and opinions. I'm not anti 718-4 and I think it has its place alongside the 6. They are certainly powerful considering their displacement and I know Brian Innes, a long time owner of both 4's and 6's loves his. After all Porsche spent most of the 1980's and early 1990's selling more 4 cylinder cars than 6 to try and modernise the range when the popularity of the 911 declined . Let's not forget they also put a flat 4 in the 914 and 912 in the early '70's so it's been done before. I also see more 718's than 981's on the road so certainly in the North-West, they've sold well.
 
I have been a fan of 6 cylinder engines from the early days, as a kid getting a lift my friends dads XJ6 and another's Bristol.
They always seemed more 'special' than 4 cylinder cars.
Of course my early car history includes '6s' 2600 Rover, TR6, numerous BMWs and now a 981.
I'm old enough to know better, but giving a 4 cylinder car some welly in the local tunnel just isn't the same...I was pondering what to change my 981 to when the time comes (it really makes driving a special event even after a lifetime of commuting and business driving) and gladly Porsche have answered the question. I'm afraid for me a '4' wouldn't have done it. Z4 anyone ? I thought not !
I wonder whether the new 4.0 will trickle down to the S and base cars...
 

Posts made and opinions expressed are those of the individual forum members

Use of the Forum is subject to the Terms and Conditions

Disclaimer

The opinions expressed on this site are not necessarily those of the Club, who shall have no liability in respect of them or the accuracy of the content. The Club assumes no responsibility for any effects arising from errors or omissions.

Porsche Club Great Britain gives no warranties, guarantees or assurances and makes no representations or recommendations regarding any goods or services advertised on this site. It is the responsibility of visitors to satisfy themselves that goods and/or services supplied by any advertiser are bona fide and in no instance can the Porsche Club Great Britain be held responsible.

When responding to advertisements please ensure that you satisfy yourself of any applicable call charges on numbers not prefixed by usual "landline" STD Codes. Information can be obtained from the operator or the white pages. Before giving out ANY information regarding cars, or any other items for sale, please satisfy yourself that any potential purchaser is bona fide.

Directors of the Board of Porsche Club GB, Club Office Staff, Register Secretaries and Regional Organisers are often requested by Club members to provide information on matters connected with their cars and other matters referred to in the Club Rules. Such information, advice and assistance provided by such persons is given in good faith and is based on the personal experience and knowledge of the individual concerned.

Neither Porsche Club GB, nor any of the aforementioned, shall be under any liability in respect of any such information, advice or assistance given to members. Members are advised to consult qualified specialists for information, advice and assistance on matters connected with their cars at all times.

Back
Top